Are DEI Mandates for University Faculties a Bad Idea?: A Debate
Open to Debate
In recent years, American universities have begun to adopt Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) as core values. Although precise definitions vary, DEI generally refers to the policy of creating a professional environment that treats all people fairly and welcomes and encourages participation by all types of people, particularly those from groups that have been historically excluded or underrepresented. As part of this effort, many institutions of higher learning include criteria of DEI expectations in setting hiring and tenure standards, and require applicants, instructors, and professors to provide personal, detailed statements on the policy.
Are these statements appropriate? Supporters of DEI mandates argue that it is fair for a university to ask faculty about DEI when such values and goals are embedded in the school's mission. These statements are not intended to push an ideological viewpoint, they contend, but to focus on and reward actions. Opponents of DEI mandates argue that they devalue merit-based evaluation and replace viewpoint diversity with a "loyalty oath." Such mandates, they contend, disadvantage faculty who may embrace other values and ideas and violates both academic freedom and freedom of speech. Are DEI mandates for university faculties a bad idea? (Audio only.)